In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

Six04 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 11:53 AM
Only in right wing world is waiting for facts to come in proof of a coverup. They waited 5 hours to call it a terrorist attack ...what are they hiding? The truth is the GOP is grasping blindly at straws because they have nothing better to do then make noise.
Mark442 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:49 PM
In other words, you"re saying" just believe what we say and go away, nothing to see here, move along, just dead Americans, no problem". You liberal idiots will keep on believing everything this administration tells you until it's too late.
Becca in TX Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 2:23 PM
Right, Mark-after all, what does it matter at this point? Do you think if Chelsea was murdered and dragged through the streets of Little Rock, Hillary would think that the "how" and the "why" would matter?
americathebeautiful Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:26 PM
OMG are one sick sick sick persona non grata.

What in the hell is wrong with you and your overt hatred and bias against the GOP?
MoreKowBell Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:07 PM
Dead Americans aren't noise, @sswipe.
DB07 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:03 PM
You've already been well-refuted. Come up with something new or go away.

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:


U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...