You know we wouldn't have this fool in the WH except for Sen Ted Kennedy. In Mar 1970 he pushed the bill that lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 essentially saying that people being eligible to be drafted and sent to Viet Nam should have the right to vote. Fine. But I feel that once we went "all volunteer" it should have been repealed EXCEPT for those serving in the military between the ages of 18 to 21. That would have eliminated all the immature "children" from the voter rolls and probably would have prevented elections from turning into "Who's The Coolest!".

Hey, the lefties WANT depopulation in order to "save the planet". You realize that it's US they'd like to "remove". We have righteous indignation, patriotism, and......lots of guns. They don't much care for any of those, especially the last. "Happiness is a warm gun!".

What else would you expect from "Airhead Huff-n-Puff". The MSM was planning to give Obama the win all along provided he didn't start speaking in tongues or yelling "Allah Akbar!".

What's your buzz? You infect sites with your advertising every single day. You're a troll or you're to cheap to pay TH and others for the space you use to push your knock offs. Vaffanculo.

It's "revisionism". The truth doesn't fit the established narrative at the time so they embellish it, delete it, or "retool" it to suit their agenda. That's why liberal progressivism is such a farce. It's all based on what is politically known as "spin" but is what we in the real world call lies. The saddest thing of all is that when they've been proven to be demonstrably false, they just don't care. Just look at the Benghazi case and the killing of our Ambassador +3. Pure bs from top to bottom for weeks and they just kept it up until finally, finally enough questions were asked to where the lie collapsed from it's own weight.

Had the MSM really done their job from the beginning instead of performing their disgusting version of "Monica Lewinski", BHO would have never received the nomination. Not that it would have mattered because then we would have "Hilarious" instead and other than race and sex there's not much daylight between them. The real problem is how folks got "caught up" in the whole thing, disregarding disturbing associations, statements and ideological positions Obama has held and continues to hold with an almost religious fervor. Like Fabian Socialists they want to destroy the "system" and "reforge" it "to their heart's desire". Essentially, going to hell in a bucket baby, but at least they're enjoying the ride. Bad part? Bucket hits bottom.

in Jul 2012 that the tree ring data used to support global warming was flat wrong. The correct data, when used, showed a distinct cooling trend of 0.3C degrees for the last two millenium. There are many, many findings by reputable scientists debunking hudman caused climate change. When your entire livelihood is dependent on government funding, why bite the hand that feeds you? Many scientists are really angry about how the "alarmists" have politicized this and brought so much discredit on true science and research.

An old saying: Garbage In-Garbage Out. Dr Jan Espers, Prog of Geology (and his group) at the Institute of Geography, Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Mainz, FRG reported in an article published in "NATURE" entitled "Global Warming Thoroughly Debunked: Will the Media Notice

An old saying: Garbage In-Garbage Out. Dr Jan Espers, Prog of Geology (and his group) at the Institute of Geography, Johannes Gutenberg Univ, Mainz, FRG reported in an article published in "NATURE" entitled "Global Warming Thoroughly Debunked: Will the Media Notice

piece of paper. They gave me a copy of everything which I took to a medical billing office and had them calculate the cost. It came out to over $6.5 million. Think about it. Ultimately, I didn't have to pay that amount. In fact I paid only for his meals. Because you see, I was in the Army at the time and he was treated in US Army Class III hospitals. Specifically, William Beaumont Army Medical Center at Fort Bliss, TX and at Walter Reed AMC. Now, under Obamacare how many babies, children of all ages, young people, middle age and the elder are going to get care if their condition is considered "not cost effective"? I'm voting for Romney.