Thanks, however, to Professor E. Donald Elliott of the Yale Law School, I had a translator at my side, and I shall now hand down my judgment of the Court's decision on Obamacare, which all sensible Americans have abstained from reading in its entirety, including B. H. Obama...
The brilliance of Robert's decision of this 0bamanation of a bill may very well be lost on the 99.9% of the angry conservatives that are in their knotted knickers over it not being sunk outright by the court. They fail to see the law is hamstrung in several major areas that Robert's achieved a majority vote as unconstitutional, which now can probably not be implemented. And as your article and several others who have actual constitutional law experience point out, now that the mandate has finally been nailed down as a TAX collected by the IRS, not a 'fee' or penalty as the democrat party lie machine has pushed it. And as a tax it can be dealt with far more easily under 'reconciliation' methods in congress. surviving urban crisis
WASHINGTON -- I have a headache. I imagine you do too, if you have been trying to interpret the legalese employed by those legal sages who have pronounced on Thursday's Supreme Court decision on Obamacare. I would rather read the lyrics of a thousand rap composers than the anfractuous language of one legal sage.
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 29 minutes ago
- EPA exonerates Christie administration in obscure bridge-related offense someone made up Mary Katharine Ham 1 hour ago
- California energy companies are getting the heck outta’ dodge and moving to Texas Erika Johnsen 2 hours ago
- CNN poll: 58% oppose abortion in most or all cases Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- Video: Rand Paul’s very libertarian speech at CPAC Allahpundit 3 hours ago
- RNC Chairman talks tactics, the GOP’s technological gap, and how the March for Life “was a little bit of a wake-up call” Dustin Siggins 4 hours ago