In response to:

Majority of Voters Favor Full Combat Roles For Women

shubi_ Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:49 AM
Might as well let women die in combat, since lib women are generally unwilling to procreate and increase the human species. One man saved by a woman dying is worth it.
xjnyc_2013 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:57 AM
LOL!!! Still want to lie and tell us you've got that Ph.D and that you're a General,
Shubes old boy???
shubi_ Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 8:30 AM
I was Navy, you moron. There are no Generals in the Navy.
Joel176 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:54 AM
Unfortunately, there would be no Lib women enlisting for this....
shubi_ Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:56 AM
So you think this is a conspiracy to kill conservative women?
Joel176 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:59 AM
No, it is a conspiracy to dilute the effectiveness of the military.

Last week as a last hoorah, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women serving combat even though women have been serving in combat for quite some time. Now, a new Rasmussen Report shows 59 percent of voters favor women serving in full combat positions.

Most voters think women in the military should be able to fight in combat just like men do. But they still believe overwhelmingly that women need to pass the same physical tests as men if they’re in special forces like the Green Berets and Navy SEALs.

...

Saturday, May 25 | 03:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:20 AM ET