In response to:

Obama, Romney Get Feisty in Second Debate

Sherri34 Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 3:42 AM
Crowley was an embarrassment- in any sane universe she would be fired for her blatant partisanship. Of course, this is modern day American "journalism" so she'll likely get a raise. The GOP are fools for signing off on any of these "moderators".
Jim Oakland Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 3:49 AM
Right. I said the same thing the other day.
Brent150 Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 3:49 AM
I dunno, I'm pretty sensitive to bias in the media, I think she's doing pretty well so far (I'm about half way through) I also really appreciate Lehrer's approach of letting the candidates talk and rebut each other. The VP debate was probably the only one I could identify partisan manipulation in, and that was pretty minor. The worst problem is the time afforded to the candidates. but it's 6 out of 270 minutes. a 5% advantage. In polling, that's just about the margin of error. I don't think conservaties can cry foul too loudly on the debate moderators.
Jim Oakland Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 3:49 AM
Right. I said the same thing the other day.
Anne_1 Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 3:45 AM
"The GOP are fools for signing off on any of these 'moderators.'"

Agreed! 100%

HEMPSTEAD, NY - President Obama was noticeably sharper and more aggressive in tonight's debate, as both candidates exchanged barbs throughout the evening.  Mitt Romney excelled by focusing on jobs, jobs, jobs, and repeatedly forcing voters to notice the canyon between Obama's rhetoric and his record.  Romney's strongest answer came after Obama attempted to apply lipstick to his failed record in office.  Romney unleashed a torrent of facts that pushed back forcefully against each and every one of those claims.  It should be cut into an ad as soon as possible.  Throughout the night, Romney was asked questions from the audience...