In response to:

Twisting the Internal Polling Knife

shelfos Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 11:09 PM
SUMMERS: You've been biased against Romney since day 1. I know because I remember some of your idiotic rants from back in the spring. You, and many others like you never really gave him a fair shot and that's why he lost. Let's face it. The Dem party once they have their candidate all coalesce. Not Repubs/Conservatives. NO, they just whined and cried and continue to do so because their candidate didn't win. Boo hoo. Do you think if your candidate couldn't beat Romney he/she'd have had a rat's chance in you-know-where against Obama?. If you had all coalesced earlier on and supported him FULLY we WOULD NOT BE IN THE FRIGGIN' mess you keep whining about. It is you and all the other dumb-heads that won't get a clue. Thanks.

In light of the revelation that Mitt Romney was "shell-shocked" by his loss last week, I've been pretty tough on the job performance of his campaign's internal pollsters, who clearly missed the mark -- resulting in costly tactical decisions down the stretch:

These analyses [of the "expand the map" strategy] make sense, but only within the context of the campaign truly believing that they were safe in other crucial must-have states -- a cataclysmically wrong assumption. When I stopped by Romney headquarters in Boston back in September, Newhouse said his team was anticipating a...