In response to:

Pro-Self Defense Sheriff Apologizes for "Embarrassing" Police Chief Testimony

sheepdogII Wrote: Mar 06, 2013 4:03 PM
Five will get you ten that he comes back and says something to the effect that since the word "confiscate" is not in the bill, it means there not confiscating your weapons. I've come to the conclusion that arguing with this clown is hopeless. Any argument we present no matter how factual will simply be ignored or as they say "go in one ear and out the other".

Ever wonder why police chiefs from big, crime ridden cities are always chosen to testify before the Senate about gun control while sheriffs are often ignored? Police chiefs are appointed. They simply serve as politicians and mouth pieces for their city councils and liberal mayors. This is the case in anti-self defense Philadelphia, Chicago, Washington D.C. Milwaukee etc. Sheriffs on the other hand are elected and represent the voices of the people they serve.

On Monday Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, the sheriff who sent out a public service announcement encouraging residents to learn how to use a...