"When a banker lends out depositor's money and then keeps the usury for himself he is a thief and I need no more than common sense to know that. " OK easy terms: You put money in the bank. The bank loans that money to someone else. They pay the bank interest on the loan. The bank pays you interest on the money you deposited. The bank keeps some of the interested paid to it to run the bank. So, is your answer to have no banks?

So Carson says "going back to George Wallace's Dixiecrats." Does he know what party Wallace belonged to? Democrat.

To some, tolerance means, "You have to tolerate me, I do not have to tolerate you."

" Their ultimate aim is the conquest of what remains of Western civilization" This is the main part I was refering to. "They" are telling us what they want to do. I think too many are not listening.

The important point is in the last two paragraphs. This is what shoud not be ignored by anyone.

Chcik-fil-a is not a government org, they should be able to run their business as they see fit. For too many groups, their version of tolerance is: You have to tolerate us, we do not have to tolerate you. I will go to Chick-fil-a this weekend. Not because I am a Christian, but because I believe in freedom for all.

Maybe, if they used it for something useful; before they sell it at the pawn shop to get money for beer, cigarettes or drugs.

"They are brave, hard working, uneducated for the most part, and certainly uninformed" I would guess from this comment that you have never been in the military, do not know anyone in the military, and do not understand what the militray does and has done for people like you. 1. They are not uneducated and uninformed. 2. The military past and present make it possible for you and others like you to say things like this. What do you think would happen to you in countries like Cuba or Venezuela if you made anti government comments?

"Ackerman admitted on JournoList that he wasn't interested in whether Barnes or Rove were in fact rascist, just that the charge was useful at that moment in time." Lon says: What Ackerman is suggesting is not as bad as what Breitbart is doing, but it is still not entirely honest. Are you really saying that it is OK for someone to make something up about someone, but that using something out of context is not OK? In my mind both are worng. If a journalist prints something that is flase, that is libel.