More nonsense from liberal infiltrators visiting the site. Every one of these ludicrous points is factually challenged and fundamentally flawed.

Really? Then disprove her comments. If not, then just find a liberal blogsite where you can make unfounded ad hominem attacks on conservatives far smarter than you.

Come on, Mark! Give him a break! He had rest up for all those appearances on the Tonight Show, Letterman, et al, and all those important campaign fund-raisers to get re-elected. Be reasonable, now, are you actually expecting leadership? Really, now!

In further reply to Nos Nevets: violating checks and balances, ignoring/violating the Constitution, legislating by executive order, etc. are valid grounds for impeachment. Again, try reading the Articles, not to mention the Constitution and Bill of Rights themselves. Your statements do not bear close examination under those grounds.

A fallacious argument; would strongly suggest you read the Articles of Impeachment. Ironically, the outgoing Secretary of State worked on a brief based on them that provided the basis for her husband being impeached decades later. Your premise is in error. Many events before the election do come under the basis of "high crimes and misdemeanors" including conduct unbecoming the leader of the Free World. It doesn't have to be "publicly notorious". And the people HAVE NOT spoken in regards to all prior events because the news has been "notorious" in suppressing them! Where did you get these misguided impressions, Pravda?

Great article. in response, I offer the following classic bit of satire: Support Gun Contriol - ti was effiective in Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia and Cuba. Does anyone NOT get it?

I guess you have a twin. The very same post is further up the chain, verbatim. And your comments, while perhaps having some validity, are totally off topic for this column.

Please enlighten me as what your post has to do with the Bill Tatro column above?

MSNBC: the last, best haven for monumental liberal, socialistic idiocy in the television industry.

I'm afraid you have a frighteningly cogent point, Mr. Brown. True national reform starts with an engaged citizenry, well informed and motivated to act upon Constitutional principles. In other words, America, WAKE UP AND GET INVOLVED!

Here's one effective solution: eliminate "gun-free zones". They only serve as the best targets for such deranged and debased individuals seeking the highest number of defenseless victims.