Sorry to all the Ron Paul supporters, but this was a very poorly expressed comment, and he needs to apologize. Katie Pavlich is correct; an apology is very necessary, if this comment is verified.

Trust him? Wouldn't be wise, wouldn't be prudent, to paraphrase Dana Carvey's satire. There are far too many indices that this President is far too consumed with attaining his aims at the expense of our liberties. Instead of a leader, we have a shameless opportunist and Chicago ward heeler.

Sorry, friend. This country is worth defending, by Christians. As for your assertion that all post-1945 wars are immoral, you seem to display a pacifistic, liberal mind-set. On what premise do you claim that?

Really? Why? He's entitled to his views, as much as the LGBT military members. We have all as a country witnessed intolerant behavior and even illegal actions by gay rights advocates in recent months. Is he a "jerk" because he doesn't "go along to get along" with the social experimentation going on in our Armed Forces?

A cogent and concise article outlining the deficiencies of the Obama Administration. I believe Mr. Ransom was trying to be optimistic despite the glaring and growing evidence that this current President was a "Manchurian Candidate". After all, hope springs eternal, and I do believe in our country's ideals, if not it's faulty pursuit of same. But let no one think John was being delusional, but rather hoping against the odds.

You mean the Democrats and President Obama only told FIVE lies about Obamacare? Wow, they must be slowing down! John, are you sure it was only five? LOL

Genetic testing for inferior babies? Citing China's abortion policy? Are you seriously using these points to validate your argument? No offense, but tell me, do you subscribe to eugenics theory also?

The hypocrisy is appalling, Bishop Jackson, and you're incontrovertibly correct!

You mean Uwe Boll is a typical Hollywood hypocrite? Shocking! (The aformentioned said with tongue firmly planted in cheek.) Typical biased cinematic bilgewater. Thanks to Brent for warning us of another bit of anti-capitalist nonsense.

Cite your facts and sources. I don't blindly agree with every poster here, but YOUR remarks are "over-the-top". Most of the Gitmo residents harmless? Really? And just where did you get that fact? Obama killed more al-Queida than Bush? If true, he did so only by following Bush's policies, which he decried and denigrated as a Senator (Including Bin Laden; that operation started in 2004, under Bush and his program, and before Obama, who took credit for it though voting against the policies.).