A lot of cultural commentators are confused these days. They believe that people’s views on same sex marriage are solely a reflection of their religious beliefs. Nothing could be further from the truth. Actually, some things could be further from the truth – like saying that Al Sharpton has integrity or that Dan Savage has class. But you get the point. The same sex marriage debate is about politics. To call it a religious debate is to miss the point entirely. Your stance on same sex marriage should vary depending on whether you consider yourself to be a conservative, a liberal,...
Okay Mike, I have a question for you. I am a conservative with strong libertarian leanings (or maybe, transitioning into a libertarian). My view on marriage is still very conservative, but I am trying to understand the libertarian position on it. I think I agree with the view that the government shouldn't have a hand in marriages at all as they are a matter of religion, but that view seems to open the door to other perspectives on marriage and sexuality. So how is that different from your description of the libertarian position? If marriage is completely tossed aside by the government and given over to religious institutions to conduct, then the issue of whether gay "marriage" should be legalized or not disappears.
- Afghan interpreters who aided US in danger of being left behind Jazz Shaw 33 minutes ago
- Sunday reflection: Matthew 13:1–23 Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- ICE has the chance to catch Jose Antonio Vargas RIGHT NOW Jazz Shaw 2 hours ago
- Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads Allahpundit 3 hours ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 15 hours ago
- WMD in Iraq a rather nuanced issue Ed Morrissey 16 hours ago