1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Tolerate or Be Stamped Out

Servo1969 Wrote: Aug 07, 2014 7:14 PM
I disagree on one point- Many will not under any circumstances believe they were wrong. They will never change their minds. Even as they are working in a sweatshop they will think to themselves, "Well, at least we got rid of all those Christian ***holes." Many Progressives are incapable of learning.
In response to:

World Leader Pretend

Servo1969 Wrote: Jun 30, 2014 5:27 AM
I doubt it. Michael was just commenting the other week about how he waited years to take an anonymous HIV test because- get this- he thought Reagan was going to round up everyone with AIDS and put them in camp! Really. First if all, it was an anonymous test so smooth move, Einstein. Secondly, I wonder if anyone got HIV because because of him? I wonder if he knows?
In response to:

The Paranoids are Back

Servo1969 Wrote: Jun 28, 2014 9:44 AM
Eat s-, Paul. Do you have any children in grade school? Have you seen their school books and homework? You write about this from a distance. I know first hand what a steaming pile Common Core is.
In response to:

The Dog Ate Our Country

Servo1969 Wrote: Jun 15, 2014 3:52 AM
Today's word is "Spoliation." Have you ever heard of that word? I bet everyone in the Obama administration has. "The spoliation of evidence is the intentional or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding. Spoliation has two possible consequences: in jurisdictions where the (intentional) act is criminal by statute, it may result in fines and incarceration for the parties who engaged in the spoliation; in jurisdictions where relevant case law precedent has been established, proceedings possibly altered by spoliation may be interpreted under a spoliation inference. The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the spoliator and in favor of the opposing party. The theory of the spoliation inference is that when a party destroys evidence, it may be reasonable to infer that the party had "consciousness of guilt" or other motivation to avoid the evidence. Therefore, the factfinder may conclude that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the spoliator. Some jurisdictions have recognized a spoliation tort action, which allows the victim of destruction of evidence to file a separate tort action against a spoliator. Spoliation is often an issue in the context where a person claims he has been injured by a defective product which he then discarded or lost. In that circumstance, the defendant manufacturer or distributor may move to dismiss the case on the basis of spoliation (instead of just having to rely on the plaintiff's usual burden of proof, the argument being that any testimony of plaintiff's witnesses would not overcome the spoliation inference born of the lost evidentiary value of the missing product itself)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoliation_of_evidence
In response to:

The Misinformed Case for Voter ID

Servo1969 Wrote: May 15, 2014 5:30 AM
Boo hoo. None of these reasons make a damn to me. The number of people in these unique situations is far overshadowed by number of fake and repeat voters. And besides, I can see ways a state government could help people in these cases vote without allowing fraud to take place.
So... if I throw a Molotov cocktail into a house and the people inside die of smoke inhalation - I have NOT murdered them. Got it.
Leftism is a religion and Abortion is its sacrament. It's most cherished ceremony is a human sacrifice to the gods of convenience.
Serious question: Do women have IUDs put in immediately after having an abortion? Is that common? I really don't know.
Got it- http://miami.cbslocal.com/2014/05/05/teachers-ban-on-reading-bibles-in-class-sparks-protest-change/ http://parklakes.browardschools.com/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=3598%3Aswornia-d-thomas&catid=5502%3A5th-grade&Itemid=11512 Swornia D. Thomas
These guys put out the video of themselves acting like jerks and they're proud of it! They think it makes them look awesome! They think they're heroes for acting like d-bags. Really. See for yourself: http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-31574-blahblahblahgate_watch_what_really_happened_when_we_kicked_a_us_senate_candidate_out_of_our_offices.html Not only that but after a little research I discovered Nigel Jaquiss, the 'Easter Bunny' question guy, won a Pulitzer in 2005! I guess 'Pulitzer prize winning journalist' doesn't mean very much nowadays, does it?
1 - 10 Next