1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Battle for the Future

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 22, 2010 1:21 PM
I'd rather pay for the cop and teacher as opposed to watching corporations donate hundreds of millions of dollars to organize and steer the government which they do to this day. Term limits need to be in place and lobbyists need to be removed from the government. I think you'd see 'real change' then.
In response to:

Obama's Muslim Mess

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 19, 2010 2:38 PM
Let's assume for a moment that Obama is Muslim, which he isn't. Bush was Christian and he surrounded himself with Christians. If we're talking about ideologies from Religion in Government, there shouldn't be any. Of course we all know that doesn't happen. We also know God spoke to Bush in the white house. Throw all that out the window what do you have? To clarify you don't have Religions that are performing these acts you have terrorists. Timothy McVeigh was Christian and we don't offer the same distinction as for some reason we do with Muslims and 9/11.
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 4:49 PM
It's people like this Larry Kudlow that make me wish we'd start a new government of the -ism. No, not Socialism, or Communism but "Commensensism". It seems that we've lost our Common sense in this country. TARP - Was needed and is all about paid back. Stimulus - Started with Bush and was managed by Obama, he didn't really have a choice here thanks to Bush. Obamacare - Hey kudos for "doing" something as opposed to doing nothing. Nothing set in concrete as of yet with this legislation. Bailout for GM, Fannie, Freddie, and AIG - Really? There could have been a fresh steamy pile of doo doo in Office at the time Bush left and it would still bail these businesses out. Why? Because there were no choices. Of course I'm 100% sure if...
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 2:23 PM
Actually I would imagine that the "Reepublican machine" could find a way to connect GWB with the extinction of dinosaurs, the plague, the Irish Famine, the Spanish Inquisition and the St. Valentines massacre. Just as it's found a way to connect Obama with the financial crisis, Socialism views, Being born in Kenya, Using Keynesian Economics (which by they way Bush used), and the oil spill in the gulf. See what I did Thar! Bending the Truth is quite easy.
Where have you been for the last 8 years? Under a rock? I think you're forgetting how this mess was created and whom the instigators were. It's not party based it's government based and both parties are to blame for this fiasco. At least we have a governable individual sitting in the highest seat in the land now. But instead of offering commentary on how to fix issues you tag one party as the culprit, even though I know deep down inside places you don't want to go, you don't really believe that one party or one individual created this.
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 2:06 PM
Wait . . . Acorn forced the banks? I honestly don't think the banks are forced to do anything they don't want to do. I have history to prove this. We all have history and a massive crater left in our financial system to prove this. Acorn is just what an acorn is . . A Nut in the Ground burried by a critter.
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 12:04 PM
Sadly this very statement is why nothing changes. Because you believe that when Reepublicans are in office they "aren't" going after your money.
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 12:00 PM
Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac were not created by Liberals. Just to clarify.
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 11:58 AM
He's got a looooooooooooooooong way to go to Catch Bush. It leaves a lot of breathing room. Whew!
In response to:

A Bullish Tea Party Revolt

Seriousbidness Wrote: Sep 18, 2010 11:52 AM
Not really the point. The point is that besides the fact that you want to anecdotal you want to simply ignore the fact that Dubya ran the country into the ground and you want his policies back. It makes absolutely no sense. It's especially interesting considering most Reepublicans agree that Dubya did just that. Now for some reason you want to tote the high horse . . . Where were you for the last 8 years? Where was outrage and the push to correct the so called America you now espouse as "getting back" when bush was at the helm and Reepublicans had Congress for 6 out of those 8 years.
1 - 10 Next