In response to:

Both Parties Agree: Sequestration Is Bad, but Better Than The Alternatives

Serge9 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:29 PM
Sequestration - that what exactly happened with another empire: USSR, four years before it collapsed. Same causes, same consequences.
Ress Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:41 PM
Not correct. The USSR collapsed as a result of the hopeless inefficiency and stagnation of its socialist economy. The hullaballoo about "sequestration" in the US is merely a distraction from our real problems, which are different from the Soviets'.
Lance8762 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:36 PM
Well, I'd agree the leadership is about the same.
Sequestration Is the Worst Option Except for All the Other Options Both Democrats and Republicans have been roundly criticizing the security and economic effects of sequestration and, at the same time, taking very little action. The only logical conclusion is that both parties agree that sequestration is an awful, terrible, harmful set of policies - except the other proposed replacements are worse.

President Obama said "these cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy." Speaker Boehner, writing in the Wall Street Journal, said "there's nothing wrong with cutting spending that much......

Related Tags: Barack Obama Sequestration