In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

Serge9 Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 11:09 AM
Hassan would kill many more fellow army men and women if not being stopped by the people with guns. Gun-free zones is a huge mistake. It is a madness implemented by liberals and liberalistic state governments to mandate gun-free zones. Anyone could bring a gun to those never being searched except law abiding citizens. Those become a pray for coward and ill. Hassan did not go to the shooting range to kill, remember?
dieseldriver Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 11:30 AM
Any commander in chief could cure the "Hassan" problem by simply ordering that a sidearm, loaded and ready to use, is part of the official uniform to be worn at all times unless engaged in some maintenance activity that would require it's removal, sort of like we took off out wedding bands and watches while working on electronics or electrical equipment. Does anyone really think Hassam would have shot up his office if everyone in there had been armed?

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...