1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Sexual Humor in Not Having Sex

Sequel Wrote: Jun 13, 2014 11:37 PM
When it's all over, if we have not chosen to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ (of no premarital sex, as well as his other teachings) it will not matter what other choices we have made.
In response to:

The Sexual Humor in Not Having Sex

Sequel Wrote: Jun 13, 2014 11:31 PM
You left out one very important word: "more people have been killed in the name of FALSE religion than all the "plagues": in the bible. The TRUE religion does not kill people.
In response to:

The Sexual Humor in Not Having Sex

Sequel Wrote: Jun 13, 2014 11:27 PM
You have to wonder why many go around telling people all about their experiences with sex. Are they wearing their promiscuous acts as a badge of honor? Or is it just a come-on for the many who might say "I'm promiscuous also!"
If it weren't for Walmart, I wouldn't be able to afford two thirds of the things I purchase there. Evidently, the city council is so union controlled that they have to object to any non-union employer, no matter the benefit to their constituents. Why? They couldn't be getting payola from the unions could they?
If we can't keep imprisoned drug lords from continuing to direct their drug dealings from behind bars, why would we think these five RELEASED Taliban planners and leaders will not continue their devious, terrorist plans and attacks?
One thing the Democrats are not short on is keeping the facts surrounding Benghazi hidden from Congress and the American people... When people have nothing to hide, they want all the facts revealed that prove beyond a shadow of doubt that they have done no wrong. When they have something to hide, they resist exhibit of any of the facts and try to keep those who know from speaking. With so much resistance and effort to hide the facts surrounding this, it makes one think there must be something really bad behind all of this. As Carney said, the facts remain the facts, but when production of facts is refused, those investigating must keep probing and require the facts by law, with stiff penalty for refusal.
If Romney had paid no taxes for 10 years, the IRS would be all over him.
Obama may be saying those who succeed didn't build the infrastructure they used to succeed. WRONG! All of us who don't receive welfare checks and who pay taxes built that infrastructure, not the government. So, either way, WE DID BUILD THAT, President ! AND, since slackers have the same advantage of the infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) our taxes have built, that those who work hard & smart enough to be successful have; why should the successful be penalized with higher taxes to pay for those who just want to get by, or loaf? That's what it's about -- higher taxes for the hard, smart workers and entrepreneurs! He'saying: "Work hard to succeed & you'll get higher taxes to pay for those who don't want to work hard, or smart."
Before getting into a hissy over this, we need to remember that Romney said he makes his best decisions when he has someone in the group who has an opposing view of the situation. Perhaps he sees Leavitt as the man to fill that spot.... who knows?
In response to:

Diane Sawyer Versus 'Too Rich' Romney

Sequel Wrote: Apr 19, 2012 1:19 AM
I'm thinking "deer in the headlights"!
1 - 10 Next