In response to:

Obama Administration to Defense Contractors: No Layoff Notices Until After Election, Please

senpar Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 10:42 PM
Eric Whitaker, Michelle Obama, Tony Rezko, John Rogers, Arthur Brazier, Marilyn Katz I Childhood of privilege not hardship II Myth rock-star professor III 1997 speech launched Obama IV Slumlord's defense B-Obama-Esq V Obama's toughest critics on Left VI Poor people BHO left behind VII Myth of B-Obama St-Sen-reformer VIII Obama's St-pension-scheme IX Arab-Amer-network behind Obama X Obama brings Chicago politics to WDC If Romney plans his offense, defense, and how to answer specific topics, ?'s, how to respond to and neutralize, Obama's pre-planned-focus-grouped cynical-exaggerated-difficult-to-counter-hyped-up-claims against Romney, He can then expose Obama for the "Fake-Phoney-Fraud" that he really is !

In an effort to make the economy look a little rosier than it is, the Obama administration is basically coercing defense contractors so as to prevent news of layoffs hitting voters before the election. With sequestration about to result in some major cuts to the defense budget, contractors will lose government business -- and that means, employees will lose jobs. But to prevent poor numbers ahead of the November election, the Obama administration has made it very, well, fiscally unwise for companies to issue layoff notices too early.

The Labor Department issued guidance in July saying it...