In response to:

Obama White House: Vulgar and Abusive

Selah Green Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 1:13 PM
Doctor Roy, if you had any credibility at all, you just destroyed it by revealing yourself to be either totally witless, completely ignorant, devoid of any respect for truth, or a soulless ideologue spewing state propaganda like a good little robot. Possibly you are all four. Apparently you do not recall the right wing uproar over George Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers as Supreme Court justice, caused by her stated belief that it was the role of the courts to legislate if they (the courts) felt the national and state legislatures were doing an inadequate job. A flaming judicial activist opposed by nearly all conservatives. And apparently you do not recall the right wing rebellion against Bush's insane effort to turn over US port
Primus54 from Ohio Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 1:33 PM
Probably mentioned somewhere further down, but TH columnists and conservatives were pretty critical of tge prescription drug entitlement and TARP 1.

Like most liberals, Roy's "history" begins anew each morning.
DoctorRoy Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 2:06 PM
Well the reaction to the port deal was a mixed bag. You had some conservatives against it (Malkin, The Washington Times) and some for it (WSJ Editorial Board). In rereading some of Malkin's column's from that time it looks like her big problem was not with Bush but mainly with Chertoff. I pretty much dismissed Malkin anyway when she wrote that Kenneth Gladney was "beaten to a bloody pulp" at a SEIU rally in St. Louis. The guy didn't have a mark on him.
Selah Green Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 3:08 PM
Here's just a few on the port deal from WND, most by Joseph Farrah.
Joseph Farah;
2/22/2006 “White House: Tone Deaf, or Brain Dead?”

2/24/2006 “The Port Deal Redux.”
2/28/2006 “The Real Port Issue.”
3/3/2006. “Don’t Buy Dubai.”
3/9/2006 “No Foreign Control of Ports.”

Robert Friender 3/11/2006 “The Day a Nuke Hit Our Port.”

You are correct that the WSJ supported that insanity.
searcherseeker Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 3:35 PM
That was BEFORE the beating!
DoctorRoy Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 4:12 PM
Selah Green Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 1:14 PM
security to a United Arab Emirates company, putting the enemy in charge of our national port security.

Your meaningless comments are really not worthy of replies, and hopefully Mr. Ransom wastes no more time reading them.
searcherseeker Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 3:34 PM
Unfortunately JR seems to like Doctor Roy. Probably because he is so easy to refute.

Catball wrote: Can anybody out there tell me the difference between the tea party and the taliban. No this is not a joke. Seriously, the tea party wants to destroy the american government. The t-party crew walked into a church and killed a doctor because they like what he was doing. That was in Wichita,KS. The t-party does want to dismantle our government. They don't want women to have any rights. M. Bachmann said you should be submissive and do whatever they want you to do. They want rich white men & women to take over the country. They don't...