In response to:

Liberalism Versus Blacks

sedonaman Wrote: Jan 16, 2013 12:38 PM
R: “What is not understandable is how so many liberals can blindly ignore 50 years of evidence to the contrary since then.” Some understanding is in Dr. Sowell’s previous statement, “Liberals' devotion to their ideology greatly exceeds their concern about what actually happens to flesh and blood human beings as a result of their ideology.” In order for liberals not to ignore 50 years of evidence [or any amount of evidence, for that matter], they would have to abandon their ideology, and they wouldn’t be liberals if they did. Whenever confronted with a question, the conservative turns to reality; the liberal turns to his ideology, for it is inconceivable to him that reality doesn’t conform to his ideology.
There is no question that liberals do an impressive job of expressing concern for blacks. But do the intentions expressed in their words match the actual consequences of their deeds?

San Francisco is a classic example of a city unexcelled in its liberalism. But the black population of San Francisco today is less than half of what it was back in 1970, even though the city's total population has grown.

Severe restrictions on building housing in San Francisco have driven rents and home prices so high that blacks and other people with low or moderate incomes have been driven out of the city....

Saturday, May 25 | 07:00 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:00 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:00 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:00 AM ET