In response to:

Charles Krauthammer: “There was No Reason to Make [Bin Laden Ad] Negative”

Seawolf Wrote: Apr 28, 2012 6:07 PM
Shoot, if it wasn't for dirty tricks and un-ethical tactics the 0 wouldn't have a campaign. He punted the decision on bin laden to Admiral McRaven so as to have a CYA position if it went bad...what a wuss, he did the same thing on the other Seal mission, the on-scene commanders made the call, he refused to allow them to shoot when the Maersk Captain tried to escape the first time and was in the water. Anyone thing McCain would have done anything like that, he has balls.
Dave M Wrote: Apr 28, 2012 9:42 PM
The way McCain has treated conservatives- you know- Us "Hobbits"-indicates that he is NOT an man of honor.
MacQ - Texas Wrote: Apr 28, 2012 6:16 PM
No McCain would definitely not have behaved like this lowlife. One may not agree with everything he's done or said, but I believe him to be a man of honor. UNlike the president we have.

Ever since the Obama reelection campaign unveiled Operation Destroy Mitt Romney, Republicans everywhere are rallying to his defense. Case in point, via Mediaite:

Of course, as shown in the segment above, Charles Krauthammer is referring to the slanderous attack...

Saturday, May 25 | 05:40 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 05:40 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 05:40 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 05:40 AM ET