In response to:

Eddie Haskell Brooks

Sean245 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:00 AM
Keep demonizing success and you will finally be rid of it, just think of it, mediocrity and misery as far as the eye can see. So as a liberal you are against traditional marriage, intact families, success, self determination, the Constitution, standards in education, free enterprise, advancing technology, civility in public discourse and Christianity just to name the short list. You libs who support the party of slavery and segregation couldn't live in a world of your own making.
CVN65 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:14 AM
No, those educated elites are the first ones lined up any time the Commies take over. What I can't figure is whther it is to prevent them from thinking that they will be in charge or just to eliminate some of the useless eaters to stave off the inevitable food shortages.
New York Times columnist David Brooks is the Eddie Haskell of the Fourth Estate. Like the two-faced sycophant in "Leave It to Beaver," Brooks indulges in excessive politeness while currying favor with political authority. He prides himself on an oily semblance of maturity and rational discourse.

But the phony "conservative" back-stabber, who has spent the last four years slavering over Barack Obama like a One Direction groupie and trashing the tea party like an MSNBC junkie, isn't fooling anyone.

Lately, Brooks has been given to dispensing passive-aggressive advice to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. His column this week titled "Thurston Howell...