Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Are Facts Obsolete?

SD3 Wrote: Dec 30, 2014 10:07 AM
Think about this. If it were not for the advent of "new media" such as Fox News and Town Hall, would any of us have seen the endless loop of President Obama telling us we can keep our doctor? Would any of us have seen the endless lies from Jonathon Gruber? Would anyone know who Lois Lerner is? Would she still be paid by the taxpayer for her lawlessness? Oh wait, come to think of it, she IS still being paid.
In response to:

Random Thoughts

SD3 Wrote: Dec 30, 2014 9:52 AM
Protocol Question. When Obama leaves office will we still have to address him as the Emperor?
In response to:

Random Thoughts

SD3 Wrote: Dec 30, 2014 9:44 AM
Black "leaders" seldom celebrate black success stories (other than Oprah on occasion) because to do so would underscore the role of individual achievement in the face of adversity. Ken Chenault, Robert Johnson,Ken Frazier, Ursula Burns, et al, were not victims, so they are unremarkable.
In response to:

2014: The Year The Liberal Lies Died

SD3 Wrote: Dec 29, 2014 9:43 AM
C'mon. No exceptions? I heard Al Sharpton say it was cold outside. And it was. I'm sure I can find a second example somewhere.
In response to:

Who's Responsible?

SD3 Wrote: Dec 23, 2014 2:55 PM
If black behavior is simply a legacy of slavery and discrimination, how do you explain the fact that black criminal activity is much higher now than it was 50 years ago? How do you explain that the percentage of births to unwed black mothers has tripled during that period? Have the legacy effects gotten that much worse during the last 50 years? Are blacks facing that much more discrimination in employment and educational opportunities than they were in 1964?
Obama, like virtually all Dems, has blocked every attempt at tort reform.
Complaining that the US military kills Muslims comes from pretty much the same mentality as those who complain about cops killing black thugs. You see, it's not that either group is doing anything criminal that would warrant killing, it's just that we don't like their race. Right.
In response to:

Governing vs. Giving

SD3 Wrote: Dec 17, 2014 6:52 PM
The reason that government discourages private efforts is that private efforts usually involve the recipient committing to do something about their condition -- go out and look for work, help in the kitchen, stop taking drugs. Government long ago decided that they wanted to be an "enabler" -- i.e. handing out "aid" to recipients with no strings attached. Dependency as an ongoing state is just fine with them.
In response to:

Climate Catastrophe

SD3 Wrote: Dec 10, 2014 9:44 AM
During the last period of significant global warming (from about AD 950 to 1250) there was no "catastrophe". In fact those who were able to farm more successfully in the northern latitudes thought this was just fine.
In response to:

Climate Catastrophe

SD3 Wrote: Dec 10, 2014 9:40 AM
These are the people who claim that the invention of the automobile was an insidious event because it causes air pollution (apparently because they'd rather be shoveling horse manure instead).
In response to:

Is Law Optional?

SD3 Wrote: Dec 09, 2014 10:25 AM
How is this any different than it was in Salem in 1692? Then they burned people accused by those who were bewitched. Now all you have to do is accuse someone of raping you, and they are burned by the media.
Previous 21 - 30 Next