In response to:

Elections Do Have Consequences…for the Media

scrow Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:28 PM
They're not in it for the money, either. They're in it to change the world to what they want it to be. Which is why the NYT is losing money and viewership on the network news is down.

It’s a common refrain from the victor: elections have consequences. The victor then goes on to claim a mandate to do A or Z. It’s par for the course. The real question is whether elections have consequences for the media. As it turns out, the answer appears to be yes.

On a whole host of issues, the mainstream media’s reporting seems to have a bit more balance, at least compared to the pre-election coverage of some of the campaign’s most important issues.

The left will dismiss this as conservative sour grapes, but ask yourself whether you saw, heard or...