In response to:

7 Liberal Hypocrites Who Call For Gun Control While Being Protected By Guns

scrow Wrote: Mar 23, 2013 10:07 PM
It is if you take the viewpoint noted by commentators and politicians (as well as common sense) that gun control without gun confiscation (or the threat therein) is inevitable.
Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 9:31 AM
Please provide an instance where the national registration of guns did NOT lead to confiscation.

sean242 Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 3:00 AM
Depends on how one defines "insane". If the goal is to restrict arms from "insane" persons then it seems more like "insane person control". Would it be Ok for an "insane" person to have and carry swords?
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Mar 23, 2013 11:01 PM
Heehee, I guess you mean that anyone who wants gun control wishes to consifcate all the guns. I'll let you figure out the proper wording of your sentene above.

I think that firearms should be kept away from insane people. Is that not gun control? Do YOU think so, too? Well that's gun control. I guess we must both want to confiscate everyones guns.

One of the great ironies of the gun control debate is that everyone who calls for gun control still wants a man with a gun protecting him. Every governor in America has armed security. You have to go through a metal detector guarded by men with guns to get into the Capitol building. Barack Obama has hundreds of Secret Service agents carrying fully automatic weapons who protect his safety. Even run-of-the-mill Democrats who want to take guns away from everyone else will unhesitatingly pick up the phone and call the police if they feel threatened -- so that a man...