Previous 11 - 20 Next
Seems to me one problem of health "insurance" is that a portion is really prepaid routine services for which the insurer acts as negotiator for price (this is much of what dental insurance is). We don't really need insurance to get the best price on birth control pills.
If he comes back to Hawaii our government will probably vote to have him move into ?Iolani Palace.
In response to:

Baseball and the Spirit of Innovation

scott s. Wrote: Feb 19, 2015 4:36 PM
Trends seem to come and go. The pull hitter from either side is one type of specialist, as is the guy who can go the other way and often hits for average. We need more guys who know situational hitting and can place the ball to move runners up or execute the hit-and-run.
"Natural law" derives from "natural rights" "Positive law" derives from "legal rights". If natural rights are in fact inalienable, then that seems to imply they can't change. Of course Jefferson kind of finessed it by claiming "self-evident truth".
When I went to school there was no "AP". It seems like mostly a marketing scheme to promote a certain product's brand. If some one wants to buy that, OK, but I don't see it as some great "opportunity" that can't be missed.
So if this part of the law (actually Title IV of the Omnibus Safe Streets and Crime Control Act of 1968) is unconstitutional what does that say about the 1925 law making handguns non-mailable (now 18USC1715)?
In response to:

No Gatekeepers

scott s. Wrote: Feb 18, 2015 2:08 PM
In the case of Wikipedia there is the phenomenon of the "editing bots". Who controls the bots controls what gets into wiki.
In response to:

No Gatekeepers

scott s. Wrote: Feb 18, 2015 2:03 PM
Sounds good, but my experience with open source software and open databases is that practice doesn't confirm theory. What seems to happen is that as the project grows, there is a perceived need for "quality control". This eventually results in the creation of "super editors" who have final say in all matters. The quality of a contributor's work becomes secondary to having the contributor "vetted" into the club by the super editors. So the contributors have to stroke the super editors or they get dumped.
I don't see it giving any cover at all. The Dems could just as easily argue to put in the money and let the courts decide. Then the 5th Circuit kills the injunction and it's Katy bar the door.
I suspect your time table for review of this temporary injunction is off. I kind of doubt this is going to sit around for a year.
I think immigration IS DHS' job?
Previous 11 - 20 Next