In response to:

Redefining Marriage Raises Concerns For Children and Society

Science Avenger Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 4:07 PM
It wasn't a basic question, it was an idiotic one, and he was right to ignore it. That you guys can't debate the issue in a straightforward way, and have to resort to personal attacks and red herrings illustrates how weak your position is.

NOTE: This is the sixth and final column in a series of columns related to National Marriage Week, Feb. 7-14, 2013. The fifth column is available here.

Much of the debate surrounding same-sex marriage asks about societal harms. Many advocates of the change quickly dismiss the question and insist that a redefinition of marriage won’t hurt anyone. But that conclusion proceeds from a misperception about what marriage is—a failure to grasp marriage’s role as a public institution that shapes our thoughts and actions.

Marriage is not merely a legal arrangement that bestows various benefits and...