I hereby nominate Camber for the King of Making Shiite Up.

How about Homoignorotic?

" I mean, we've never seen a consensus of "scientists" support a cause for the sake of their own gain (global warming, darwinism to name a couple big ones" Big whats? Examples of just how ignorant you are? Evolution is established scientifically beyond a scintilla of doubt. Global warming has not reached that level, but it is not far behind. What's next, you going to reject quantum physics and relativity too because they conflict with your common sense?

I grant our bathroom arrangements will have to change, or we'll have to jettison our no-sexual-attraction standard. It's the sole logical argument you guys have. That the only reason?

The majority of educated humanity disagrees with you, and call me weird, I place a lot more credance on their opinions than yours. But enlighten us, what pray tell is your superior method? Bibbling? Naval gazing (otherwise known as philosophy)? Reading entrails? Impress us!

Sure, as long as you include that homosexuality has appeared throughout nature and humanity as long as those things have been studied, and so they too are part of the evolutionary story of our species. That's your problem, you want to pick and choose what science you pay attention to, instead of looking at ALL of it. You also are intent on attaching your normative evaluations of what is an disn't "normal" onto science. Science has no place for such things. Science is not about what should or should not be. Science is about what is, what was, and what will be.

Once again, you've run off the rails. The discussion isn't about anatomy, it's about psychology.

If you think urinals have any relevance in this discussion, or that anyone is confused by why they are there, you're as insane as you accuse others of being. Either that, or you are just determined to win the Nonsequitor of the Year award.

Oh, and I hate to break the news to those obsessed with what is natural, but monogamy amongst humans is NOT natural. We are naturally polyamorous, check out any of the other great apes for confirmation. Or just note the huge proportion of unfaithfulness in marriage.

No, I think it is an idiotic anachronism left over from before we had good birth control, economic equality (sort of) for women, and knowledge of disease transmission. It's a relic of a past time, and it is fading as we speak.

Your an idiot if you think he's talking about revenge. I swear sometimes it seems like you guys are incapable of presenting your opponents' arguments fairly. Aquinas would not approave.