Typical cowardice in speaking for Carl Sagan, a man long dead, implying he would side with the bigots on gay marriage. The evidence for this, as with so many of the assertions here, is nonexistent. And hello, 1972 was 40 years ago. Way to keep current, you may not know this being so ignorant of science as so many of you are, but we've learned a lot over the last 40 years. Do try to keep up.

"The more homosexuals the less chance of our survival. That is a scientific fact," No it isn't, that's just making BS up, like all the anti-gay marriage garbage here. Scientists in the fields you speak for laugh at your ignorance. Check out the world, the problem humanity faces is that there are too many of us, not that there are too few. And if you actually observed reality, you'd know there are thousands of children born of homosexuals. But that conflicts with your ideology, so you deny reality.

"They beat back the forces of Cultural Marxism..." Riiiight, because if there is one thing that stood out about Marxists, it was their support of gay marriage. /eyeroll As Rush rightly pointed out years ago, words mean things. Learn it, live it.

"Marriage is between members of the opposite sex, ultimately for purposes of reproduction" What did you do, wake up from a 100 year nap? Marriage hasn't been about procreation for a long long time. You can't expect people to take you seriously when you spout blatant falsehoods like that.

The analysis is flawed. If one wants to know the effect of drinking on driving, one must look at the proportion of drivers at X% BAC that have accidents, NOT the proportion of accidents that involve drivers at X% BAC. To do otherwise is to reason such that one might say with equal validity that driving with clothes is dangerous, since 100% of accidents involve clothed drivers!

Bill Ayers? Really? Because fixating on him worked so well for you in 2008? I can't wait for the followups on Reverend Wright, Saul Alinsky, and ACORN.

Yes, its quite a miracle that Christians can be the overwhelming majority of our society and a persecuted minority all at the same time.

We're less concerned with Islamists because they aren't the ones meddling with our lives so much. They are in fact more idiotic then Christians, but luckily most of them are across the pond, or we'd be even more concerned with their goofy views.

Calling atheism a religion exposess ignorance of the highest order, or semantic dishonesty, take your pick.

When a gay person tries to force you to be in a gay relationship, then you can characterize it as forcing himself on you. Until then, its just histrionics.