1 - 6
The word impeach is similar to the legal term indict, or formally charge. The House of Representatives has the power to impeach (indict) through articles of impeachment. The Senate "tries" the case (i.e. "impeachment hearings" @JRusso). So, to get a conviction is unlikely as long as the Democrat Party holds a majority in The Senate. Now, say that all of the judges in a town are corrupt and there is no way that the Sheriff or Attorneys General can get a conviction against the criminal syndicate in the town. Should the Attorneys General not indict any criminals known to work for this syndicate? I would suggest that if the townsfolk (the United States citizens) are allowed to hear all of the charges against the criminal (Eric Holder, Susan Rice, Lois Lerner ,,, take your pick)?
In response to:

No Regulation? No Problem

ScandallB Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 2:12 PM
The problem that most of the U.S. population has with the Constitution is we are so conditioned to look at a limiting document to see what we cannot do. Our Constitution is written to tell us what the federal government CAN do. It says what the representatives requirements are, thier duties and obligations. It further states that if the power to perform an act is not in the Constitution the federal government is prohibited from doing it. That power or authority falls to the States or the people (communitiies).
In response to:

No Regulation? No Problem

ScandallB Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 2:03 PM
On Sunday you get zero costomer service at the DMV. That is the best day to deal with them. At least you do not get a negative attitude.
In response to:

Trickle Down and Tax Cuts

ScandallB Wrote: Oct 04, 2012 10:50 AM
This is a very difficult concept to understand because most people think of economics as being a linear or static concept. i.e. if the government takes a smaller percentage in income tax, then it must necessarily get less in income tax. WRONG When the government allows the people to keep more of their money, they will spend it. When more stuff is purchased, businesses make more profit. When businesses make more profit, businesses need to hire more people to work for them. Guess what those new employees do? They pay income taxes. Think of it this way: 1. Assume that you tax 100 people at 25%. 2. What if you had 150 people to tax at 20%? Which income stream would be higher?
In response to:

Trickle Down and Tax Cuts

ScandallB Wrote: Oct 04, 2012 10:50 AM
This is a very difficult concept to understand because most people think of economics as being a linear or static concept. i.e. if the government takes a smaller percentage in income tax, then it must necessarily get less in income tax. WRONG When the government allows the people to keep more of their money, they will spend it. When more stuff is purchased, businesses make more profit. When businesses make more profit, businesses need to hire more people to work for them. Guess what those new employees do? They pay income taxes. Think of it this way: 1. Assume that you tax 100 people at 25%. 2. What if you had 150 people to tax at 20%? Which income stream would be higher?
science merely defines and explores the laws of nature. Science should not take religous "sides" but should look at what can be defined. Take a step away from the microscope and see that it is difficult to explain how all that we know about physics, biology, etc. could be a cosmic accident.
1 - 6