In response to:

The GOP's Immigration Mess

Sanity102 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 6:56 PM
This is NOT rocket science; honest. To change the anti-immigration image, you have to: 1-Secure the borders meaning BOTH borders not just the Mexican one. 2- Saying that a fine being paid is Amnesty should mean the same for any breaking of the law, INCLUDING SPEEDING; and if you aren't for that type of payment "amnesty", then you should want any law breaker to be thrown into jail right? And no, not being able to afford to jail ALL law breakers shouldn't be an excuse not to do so. It's either amnesty or it isn't. 3-Understand that for most minorities, caring about Hispanics 4 months before an election don't cut it. And yeah, minorities listen to the vile rhetoric and identify. Such talk makes conservatives look racist and ugly.
loadstar Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 7:44 PM
Yeah, and Fire Ants don't much like Amdro either...we will be overcome and RUINED by ILLEGAL aliens if they are not stanched.

Ultimately, it is their low aptitude that is crippling...we are already stuck with too many millions of those from the last doomed effort at using the low aptitude in servitude.

I know, I am being "racist"...but simply look at ANY real criterion of aptitude and achievement...the brown people get there ONLY with AA gimmicks.

On Saturday I will be debating Mark Kirkorian on immigration policy before the National Review Institute.

I am a "wet," on the topic. Have been since I opposed California's proposition 187 in 1994.

Mark, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, is a "dry."

Here's the interesting thing about out "debate," to be moderated by National Review's Jim Geraghty: Even if one or the other of us succeeds in persuading everyone in the room of our point of view, it doesn't matter. Not a lick. The GOP is branded as an anti-immigrant party, especially with voters under 30, the...