Why do we continue to see the words "suspected" or "alleged" when referring to the Tsarnaev brothers? This bothers me. We have video proof of their actions, and the younger brother has already admitted to it. So what the hell? What about their victims? Are they "alleged" victims? I'm familiar with the concept of "innocent until proven guilty," but I think that we sometimes take that concept too far in this country, especially when dealing with known terrorists who are caught red-handed.

I'm doubtful that this will lead to impeachment hearings. Regardless, what matters is that enough of the American people will have their eyes opened to the true nature of this devious administration. If those people then vote their conscience in 2014, then Obama will have effectively been impeached by the American people! Am I being too optimistic?

Also, Obama refuses to go after the known Islamist perpetrators of the Benghazi attacks. Oh yeah, and Nidal Hasan (the Fort Hood jihadist) continues to get paid by the Army/ He has "earned" $278,000 from the Army while doing time for murdering our servicemen and women. Commander-In-Chief, my @$$!!

From Wikipedia: "The UFW during Chavez's tenure was committed to restricting immigration. Chavez and Dolores Huerta, cofounder and president of the UFW, fought the Bracero Program that existed from 1942 to 1964. Their opposition stemmed from their belief that the program undermined U.S. workers and exploited the migrant workers."

"Sí, se puede" was the slogan that Cesar Chavez used back in the 60's. Obama basically plagiarized the slogan, which literally translates to "Yes, you can," turning it into "Yes, we can." Why does this matter? Because, ironically, Chavez was against illegal immigration, and was in favor of severely limiting the importation of cheap migrant workers from Mexico.

The important 'detail' is that Dems attempted to use Sandy relief as a way to get their own pet projects passed. That's nearly as bad as the scumbags who set up phony charity organizations after tragedies occur.

By the way, I heard that a teacher had her kids sing "Jesus Loves Me" during the tornado. Let's hope that the ACLU doesn't try to sue her.

They voted against it because the Dems loaded it up with pork that was completely unrelated to Sandy!

This kind of thuggery is par-for-the-course for a Chicago politician. Of COURSE Obama used the IRS to intimidate his opponents. It's what he, Axelrod, and the rest of the Chicago Machine does. They did it in his very first campaign, back in '96. Obama wiped out his competition, not through a fair vote, but with sleazy tactics. Here's the link to that CNN report: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWZ3w6lNHv8 Please share this story with others! We need to show that there is a precedent to this pattern of dirty politics coming from the Obama White House.

So sad to see this kids pulled from the rubble that used to be their school. But I have to ask; why in the HELL were these kids in school in the first place? Furthermore, why was there no tornado shelter built into this school? This is an area known as "tornado alley," so why weren't these people better prepared for this? Not blaming; just wondering.