In response to:

The “NEED” For Immigration Reform

samplin Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 7:18 AM
And we don't think anarchy is in the offing. Leno had it right. The push for amnesty is to gain voters for the Democratic Party which seems to favor those who don't do the RIGHT thing.
Henryk A Kowalczyk Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 10:27 AM
Traditionally, Democrats have been more pro-socialistic and Republicans have been more for the free market. However, not recently. Immigration is one of the instances that Republicans are as socialistic as Democrats are. If on this issue, Republicans would stick to their pro-capitalistic, free market oriented policy, they would be pro-immigration. Consequently, all immigrants, legal, illegal and future ones would vote Republican. So would do most of all Americans, as increased immigration would be a boost to the economy.
spectator2 Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 12:56 PM
If you would only recognize sovereignty, borders, or the concept of countries, you might come up with a more cogent retort, er, response. As it is, you make no sense.

Last week I wrote about the battle for words and need to reclaim the language. We have to make sure words have meaning, no matter who how offensive a tiny slice of people find some of them.

No sooner had the ink dried on that piece than the Associated Press stepped up and declared the term “illegal immigrant” dead. “The Stylebook no longer sanctions the term “illegal immigrant” or the use of “illegal” to describe a person. Instead, it tells users it assumes another option will “evolve.” Can’t you just imagine hundreds of “senior fellows” at various...