1 - 5
Before you jump to the conclusion that the last 100 years were part of the 'normal' patterns in Earth's history, perhaps read this: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/were-screwed-11-000-years-worth-of-climate-data-prove-it/273870/ and this: http://www.skepticalscience.com/marcott-hockey-stick-real-skepticism.html
Sure if you prefer to believe some 'watchmaker' made this planet with the intent to deal with humanities sudden release of vast amounts of CO2, stored for hundreds of millions of years, sure, then anything is possible in the world of yours.
Its not a 'divine conspiracy' and in fact no conspiracy at all. The atmospheric temperatures are much more variable than those of the oceans. If you are interested in how ocean heat content is measured and what the current results and trends are then look here: http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/
Bill, Science does produce consensus through checking and checking again what is published. This has nothing to do with voting.
And what labs are these dave?
1 - 5