Previous 11 - 20 Next
We have gangs shooting up Chicago, drug use is rampant in all major cities and Obama is going after Christians and gun-owners?? It's almost as if he wants America to fail.................
No matter how great the tax revenues Regressives will always claim that it is the ABSOLUTE minimum amount to forestall chaos and anarchy without their wise tutelage.
And from whence does the "Right" to own property come?
In response to:

On the Woodward Affair

Samaritan01 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 12:29 PM
The "secret" to Obama's impregnability has always been the media's unwillingness to question, even in the slightest, their messiah's lies. The cat is now out of the bag and longtime leftist Lanny Davis in now revealing that he too has been threatened by the Obama White House; What other revelations are now going to be made public? Tick-Tock, Tick-Tock................
First of all no Conservative should ever argue gun rights from a stand point of "need", the Second Amendment enumerates the Right of gun ownership that comes from God, period. The issue of need never enters into the argument even if we actually do need to own a firearm, again firearm ownership is a Right and I would no more argue this from a stand point of need than I would argue my "need" for freedom of speech, religion and so forth. Secondly, if everyone actually knew first-hand how scummy most Hollywood types are in real life they would rapidly lose their interest in the glitterati and spend more time in important pursuits like family, religion and (Oh, I don't know....) maybe shooting sports.
In response to:

Shepherds and Sheep

Samaritan01 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 1:05 PM
Cass Sunstein is absolutely correct, some people do make terrible mistakes.....after all they elected Obama didn't they??
Keep an eye on this chucklehead but don't worry too much, he's overreaching in a MAJOR way and even New Yorkers will tire of him soon.
Our correct response can, and must be, MOLON LABE.....if you can.
A correct reading of the Second Amendment might actually mean that citizens are limited only to weapons that might be used to keep their particular State free. Read the Second Amendment and give this a thought, the Second Amendment is all about 1. A well regulated Militia 2. the necessity of security of a free state and 3. The Right to Keep and Bear firearms. Like it or not (and I do) the Second Amendment DEMANDS that people have access to weapons capable of maintaining the security of a free State. Now I ask you what might those weapons be??
In response to:

Obama: No Doubt We Need More Taxes

Samaritan01 Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 1:10 PM
To a hammer everything looks like a nail and to a Leftist the answer to everything is increased taxes.
Why do I need a high capacity military assault weapon? The answer is simple, I don't need a reason because it is my Right to own one it is that simple. I don't question your Right to freedom of speech or reasonable search and seizure laws so please leave your hands off of my right to protect myself in the way I see fit. If you feel safer with few or no weapons feel free to advertise this fact by placing a large poster on your front lawn, "This home is a gun free zone"!! See, don't you feel safer already?
Previous 11 - 20 Next
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET