In response to:

‘Marriage Equality’ Spells ‘Marriage Extinction’

sam allen Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:30 PM
You know what I find odd. How many people cannot follow a logical argument, and therefore end up attacking the person rather than the argument. Or perhaps you prefer the Alinsky tactic because you just don't want to talk about the argument. Barber laid out a clear argument and even presented evidence that at least some in the opposition understand the argument and desire this result. Those argument is not primarily about gays, lesbians, or even same-sex relationships, the argument is primarily defending something we consider good, namely traditional marriage. We consider it good because we see the effects of not having good family all over the place in our society.

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two of the most critical cases of our time. On Tuesday, March 26, attorneys will make the pitch both for and against California’s Proposition 8. This, of course, is the Golden State’s pro-marriage amendment. It maintained the timeless definition of natural marriage as between man and wife.

Then, on Wednesday, March 27, the high court will consider the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), passed in 1996 with overwhelming bipartisan support and signed into law by then President Bill Clinton. It, likewise, secured the definition of legitimate marriage...