In response to:

Redefining Marriage Raises Concerns For Children and Society

S.17 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 9:15 AM
Can we stop pretending that gay men are interested in getting “married?” Despite the shockingly high number of gullible people who fall for such nonsense, it’s never been true—and never will be. Gay men want society to accept their promiscuous relationships. That is the bottom line of gay rights and the push for "gay marriage." And once promiscuous relationships are indeed accepted by society, chaos will be the result.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 4:23 PM
Savage only verbalizes the universally understood truth of the homosexual "community," that sexual monogamy and silly and old-fashioned, and that the point of the lifestyle is constantly fresh meat.

Your bluff was called long ago, by honest former homosexuals who escaped the insane asylum.
David3036 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 2:49 PM
If Dan Savage is the "guru" regarding gay relationships, is Hugh Heffner the fole model for straight relationships? After all, he did make a lot of money promoting promiscuity and a LOT more people know about him than know who Dan Savage is.
du2 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 1:55 PM
So, you want to judge ALL gay men by Savages example? So let's judge all het men by the Kennedy's or Bill Clinton. In fact, a thrice divorced Senator sponsoring DOMA and an adulterer signing it, kinda made the idea of making a federal case out of defending marriage from gay people, ludicrous hypocrisy, doncha think?
du2 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 1:52 PM
Can we stop pretending that there are any discriminatory laws of marriage based on promiscuity? MEN are more promiscuous than women in general. Hetero men who are promiscuous aren't required to give their scores to the gov't to determine fitness to marry. There are no morals, competence, endurance, health or fertility tests to marry. THAT is the bottom line of the laws of this country. You bringing it up, is proof that you expect another set of unfair double and triple standards for gay people that don't exist for anyone else. And can't be enforced anyway. You'd have to discriminate against het men too. And you KNOW that ain't gonna happen.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 10:16 AM
Monogamous? Yeah, right.

Even numerous high-profile homosexual activists have admitted that they want no part of traditional monogamy in their relationships. Dan Savage, your sex "guru" among them.

NOTE: This is the sixth and final column in a series of columns related to National Marriage Week, Feb. 7-14, 2013. The fifth column is available here.

Much of the debate surrounding same-sex marriage asks about societal harms. Many advocates of the change quickly dismiss the question and insist that a redefinition of marriage won’t hurt anyone. But that conclusion proceeds from a misperception about what marriage is—a failure to grasp marriage’s role as a public institution that shapes our thoughts and actions.

Marriage is not merely a legal arrangement that bestows various benefits and...