In response to:

Why This Obsession With Iran?

RyanM Wrote: Jul 06, 2012 12:30 PM
I couldn't agree more. Anti-neocon, If you aren't aware of him Paul Mulshine is also a fine commentator of the Pat Buchanan/Ron Paul view. http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/index.html
RyanM Wrote: Jul 06, 2012 12:39 PM
You're welcome, AN.

Paul is a great writer.

Now, if Louie would read his link and learn something here we might get out of this swamp.

http://whtt.org/newwhtt/
anti-neocon Wrote: Jul 06, 2012 12:35 PM
thank you very much for your reply, ryan. i truely appreciate the link to this additional information on this very important issue !!
"Iran is not seeking to have the atomic bomb, possession of which is pointless, dangerous and is a great sin from an intellectual and a religious point of view."

Thus did supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declare in February that Iran's possession of atomic weapons would be a mortal sin against Allah.

It is also the unanimous judgment of the U.S. intelligence community, declared in 2007 and affirmed in 2011, that Iran has abandoned any program to build nuclear weapons.

Is the Ayatollah lying? Is the entire U.S. intel community wrong?

Iran's plants, at Natanz, where uranium is enriched to 5...

Wednesday, May 22 | 03:46 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:46 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:46 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:46 PM ET