In response to:

Video: Lindsey Graham Decimates WH Talking Points on Benghazi

Ryan_M Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 3:57 PM
"Apparently the Paultard took enough bong hits that it passed out on it's mother's sofa?" No, he got tired of dealing with people who have the minds of small children. Very few of you can make an argument based on facts, logic and reason.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 5:05 PM
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 5:04 PM
I wouldn't get along well in congress with any of the weasels you would vote for either.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 5:03 PM
I wouldn't get along well in congress with any of the weasels you would vote for either.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 5:03 PM
I wouldn't get along well in congress with any of the weasels you would vote for either.
Becca in TX Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 4:27 PM
Ryan is another Paulistinian. They have total loyalty to the man who never accomplished anything, because he never learned to play well with others and he'd rather get nothing than to get part of what he wants. This makes sense to them. That should tell you why it's pointless to discuss anything with them. Flag and ignore.
Cal29 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 4:06 PM
..............you gun running muzzie lover.
Cal29 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 4:05 PM
Cal29 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 4:04 PM

A virtuosic and tenacious performance from South Carolina's senior Senator, who happens to be a former military prosecutor.  Watch below as he holds Secretary Panetta and General Dempsey's feet to the fire on Benghazi, eliciting several eye-opening admissions: (1) The president only discussed the attack once before its conclusion and never asked for a single status update throughout the seven-hour siege.  (2) Aside from the small Tripoli support team, no US assets were deployed during the hours-long attack.  (3) Gen. Dempsey was "surprised" that Secretary Clinton was unaware of Amb. Stevens' urgent cable warning about the deteriorating security situation...