In response to:

Transforming Normalcy

RW6 Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 9:13 AM
There are people who engage in gay sex, and have same-sex attractions. There are no "homosexuals." To pretend this is an immutable, objective state of being is incoherent.
Tommy_Maq Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 1:22 PM
So your 'argument' is to assume the conclusion, instead of having good reasons to trust it?
sean242 Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 11:22 AM
There are Muslim men that engage in sex with boys because they are forbidden to have sex with women outside of marriage that don't consider themselves "homosexual". Sounds pretty qu&&r to me.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 10:09 AM
Another definition is behavior-based, people who actually ENGAGE in homosexual acts.

Is a man an adulterer because he has natural attraction to other women not his wife?
HeraldOfGalactus Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 10:05 AM
The definition of a homosexual in science is an individual that is attracted to the same gender. You state there are people who have these attractions so you are contradicting yourself when you say there are no homosexuals.

Dr. Jennifer Morse recently gave a perfectly civil and thoroughly Christian talk to a group of Catholic college students in Iowa. In a speech deeply rooted in compassion, she urged students to reach out to same-sex attracted classmates and offer them friendship. She thought they could benefit from chaste friendships, and that they would not necessarily get much of that type of support from others on campus.

The response to Jennifer's speech was predictable. The Gaystapo took to the internet with a series of egregious mischaracterizations of the speech - all of which were intended to intimidate those who would dare...