1 - 7
In response to:

The Witch Hunt Against Bob McDonnell

Russell66 Wrote: Feb 03, 2015 11:30 AM
ETHICS & ENFORCEMENT: We just need to let citizens bring criminal complaints to the grand juries as our law already requires even when the crime is perpetrated by officials & judges. EVERY member of the VRICO Va Bar & GA is conclusively evidenced in the public record of being guilty of the these crimes - at least as accessory-before-the-fact. The other VA Ethics code that is criminally UNCONSTITUTIONAL SPECIAL LAW for special people was perpetrated w/o lawful authority and so VOID from its birth. THE CUSTOMARY CORRUPTION IN VIRGINIA IS SO BROAD, DEEP & HUGE that the only feasible fix is Governor McAuliffe's adjudication of the guilty by broad grant of PARDON under the virtue of PENITENT PAROLE OATH.
In response to:

The Witch Hunt Against Bob McDonnell

Russell66 Wrote: Feb 03, 2015 11:28 AM
THE CRIMINALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL 'SPECIAL' ETHICS LAW ENCOURAGES our government officers to think that they can rightfully perpetrate felony: VA18.2-111 "Embezzlement" of money or other things had by virtue of office ( in short detail: A trade that fails the common law smell test is unlawful in Virginia, this includes jobs given to others as unlawful consideration to buy unlawful ends as with Warner:Puckett) ; VA18.2-111 "Embezzlement" of the lawful laws via adulteration or wrongful use by officers entrusted with the laws' administration and/or creation; VA18.2-481(5) "Treason" of "Resisting the execution of the (true) laws under the (mere) color of its (the true laws') authority" AND VA18.2-482 "Misprision of Treason" regarding those all to common VA18.2-481(5) "Treason" felonies.
In response to:

The Witch Hunt Against Bob McDonnell

Russell66 Wrote: Feb 03, 2015 11:26 AM
THE CRIMINALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL 'SPECIAL' ETHICS LAW FOR SPECIAL people is not useful to Virginia or even necessary. It encourages VA government officials to perpetrate federal "Obtaining property under color of official right" and so enables politically motivated federal prosecutions that "reward political friends and punish political opponents". Without practical benefit the unlawful VA ethics law enables federal tyranny. VA18.2-111 allows Gifts that are useful to an office to offset ANY office expense (inspection trip to a uranium mine and the like broadly speaking) should be receipted by the office's book keeping on official office stationary with a mere polite thanks for service to the Commonwealth as the explicitly exclusive reward.
In response to:

The Witch Hunt Against Bob McDonnell

Russell66 Wrote: Feb 02, 2015 5:33 PM
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/wvir/documents/McDonnellTrialCharges.pdf If this link to the charges is true then it looks like the charges on Bob met the requirements 18USC1951 "Obtaining property under the color of right" & 18USC Chapter 63 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201 So it would appear that McDonnell was not convicted under 18 U.S. Code § 201 - "Bribery of public officials and witnesses". 18USC201 seems to fit Gov. Bob McDonnell except the he was not a 'public official' covered the the law's definition. So folks' complaint about 'Quid pro quo" evidence does not have to apply in the law McDonnell was CONVICTED under. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201
In response to:

Cuccinelli Unveils Education Plan

Russell66 Wrote: Oct 23, 2013 11:56 AM
4) McAuliffe's LIE:“Local Communities would face a choice:” 4a)“layoff teachers and raise class size “ “or” 4b) “raise property taxes.” 4# TRUTH; If the students fled an abusive ineffective school for a better school their trust-benefit-money would move with them. If a disfavored school lost students its balanced budget would drop. If the disfavored public school administrators insist on making that disfavor their locality's problem rather than the administrators' problem (which is the consequences of their students voting with their feet) then the locality voters will rise against those administrators and firmly send them away. 5) McAuliffe's LIE: “Ken Cuccinelli, he's focused on his own agenda - Not us.” 5# TRUTH: Ken Cuccinelli's proposed policy is what the law of Virginia already requires. Ken just recognizes that those who would embezzle funds and authority are wrong if not knowingly and willingly criminal. The policy is no more than his duty under http://constitution.legis.virginia.gov/constitution.htm#5S7 “The Governor shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” There appears to be no impediment to this good and statute required thing that Ken Cuccinelli proposes in Article VIII of the Va. Constitution nor in Chapter 22 or 22.1 of the Code of Virginia . This review of the facts of Virginia's law appears consistent within Ken Cuccinelli's intentions declared at http://www.cuccinelli.com/apples/ and http://www.cuccinelli.com/the-cuccinelli-plan-for-higher-education/ . For those reasons McAuliffe's ad “Schools” http://youtu.be/eh4mPUhan70 is a five count of 18USC§1343 felony times the count of times he ran this ad. And he attempts to make other people conspire with him in Va18.2-111 “Embezzlement” of the laws as Governor McAuliffe but he openly attempts Va18.2-481(5) “Treason” of “Resisting the execution of the laws under the (mere) color of the laws authority”.
In response to:

Cuccinelli Unveils Education Plan

Russell66 Wrote: Oct 23, 2013 11:55 AM
'Schools' http://youtu.be/eh4mPUhan70 in Section 2 of the Pro Forma Indictment of Terry McAuliffe obligated by 18USC4 Draft 2 as of 10/23 10AM 1) McAuliffe's LIE:“As governor where would Ken Cuccinelli take his extreme agenda? “ 1# TRUTH: Intentionally deceptive by tone and hence fraudulent. Only extreme in that Ken's agenda righteously advances the students' interests, and the people of Virginia's interests, in achieving as great an education for its students as its money available for that purpose can buy. The money is had in trust for the students' educational benefit – All interest that others might conceit is contrary to Virginia's law regarding trusts in which trusts (including implicit or constructive trusts) are for the BENEFIT OF THE BENEFICIARIES ( VA §64.2-703. Mandatory Rule 3a ) and none other except in a fashion entirely incidental to the beneficiaries receiving due benefit. The interests that ALL parties might conceit for plundering that money-had-in-trust is no less than VA18.2-111 and Va18.2-481(5) felony. 2) McAuliffe's LIE:“Our schools. Cuccinelli's education plan would take money away from public schools.” 2# TRUTH: False- Not so – Implies that there has been a fraudulent assignment of the Beneficiaries' rights to that money-had-in-trust. The money is for the benefit of the students and Va. (or local) money-had-in-trust moves with the student so long as the student is a student in the trust money's geographic bounds. A school maybe defined as public to the degree that any qualified student may transfer into that school along with their public trust funding so long as the school has capacity within its limits of facilities and personnel and all other statutory requirements are meet. 3) McAuliffe's LIE:”That's Right, Take money away from public schools – to fund private schools instead.“ 3# TRUTH: What the statutory head trustees of the money-had-in-trust do with that money-had-in-trust and how they lawfully meter it or lawfully distribute it is entirely within the authority of those statutory Trustees so long as they do not alienate the money-had-in-trust for the beneficiaries and in any way the is either an unlawful contract (say in perpetuity as McAuliffe implicitly trolls to to special interests like school officials), or not for the benefit of the beneficiaries (Va. Students). . . . . Continued
Threats from the Democrats? The State of McAuliffe is replacing the Commonwealth of Virginia - that is apt to be indictable as Va18.2-11 and Va18.2-481(5) felony in any Va locality the felony touches.
1 - 7