1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:02 PM
There is no false dichotomy. There are 1.8 born babies and 1.4 abortions dying each second. If you spend 1. second saving fetuses then 1.8 born babies die. I suggest you learn what a false dichotomy is before we continue.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 11:20 PM
Your argument proves that if you melt candles together you get candles. That is all it proves. When the DNA of the egg and sperm fuse they do not lose their identity. If you examine the DNA it will show the evidence of born strands of DNA. No new DNA is created, only old DNA is fused. The "traits" of the phenotype will be the traits of the old DNA not a new trait. You should read the information that I post for you to read. Stop making a fool of yourself.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:46 PM
It is also the same DNA of the sperm and egg. So if the fetus is a baby then the sperm is a baby at an earlier stage. The expression of the DNA may not produce a human life. In fact only 30 percent of conceptions will produce human life, 42 percent will produce life that cannot live as a human. And the balance will die for other reasons. It is scientifically impossible to prove there is any life at conception. The fact is there is no way to test the DNA to determine what will be expressed in advance of the expression. Until birth, there is no proof a born baby will be produced. If you think otherwise, then you need to patent your process, because no one else can figure out how to prove life until it is born.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:40 PM
It is also the save DNA of the sperm and egg. So if the fetus is a baby then the sperm is a baby at an earlier stage. The expression of the DNA may not produce a human life. In fact only 30 percent of conceptions will produce human life, 42 percent will produce life that cannot live as a human. And the balance will die for other reason. It is scientifically impossible to prove there is any life at conception. The fact is there is no way to test the DNA to determine what will be expressed in advance of the expression. Until birth, there is no proof a born baby will be produced. If you think otherwise, then you need to patent your process, because no one else can figure out how to prove life until it is born.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:23 PM
You said: "There is nothing exclusive about saving the lives of the unborn and the post-born. It doesn't take much skill in multi-tasking to understand "why." Scientific law shows that it is impossible to save both. Multitasking will not work. There are 1.8 born babies dying each second and 1.4 abortions per second. You cannot save all. If you spend 1 second saving fetuses, then 1.8 born babies will die. The proof is you murder born babies.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:21 PM
You said: "There is nothing exclusive about saving the lives of the unborn and the post-born. It doesn't take much skill in multi-tasking to understand "why." Scientific law shows that it is impossible to save both. Multitasking will not work. There are 1.8 born babies dying each second and 1.4 abortions per second. You cannot save all. If you spend 1 second saving fetuses, then 1.8 born babies will die. The proof is you murder born babies.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:20 PM
You said: "There is nothing exclusive about saving the lives of the unborn and the post-born. It doesn't take much skill in multi-tasking to understand "why." Scientific law shows that it is impossible to save both. Multitasking will not work. There are 1.8 born babies dying each second and 1.4 abortions per second. You cannot save all. If you spend 1 second saving fetuses, then 1.8 born babies will die. The proof is you murder born babies.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:17 PM
I admit you are acting like you are confused. However, you have been notified that you are murdering life, yet you continue to murder. Your old excuse was that you were preserving life, but that excuse is no longer valid. You now have a choice, you may choose to save born babies or let them die. We know the choice you have made to this point. You choose to murder born babies.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:12 PM
You really have a poor understanding of this problem. The DNA is not new, the combination of DNA is new. However the combination may not be a human life. Until the DNA expresses the correct phenotype, there is no proof that life exists. However 30 percent of conceptions will present human life, but 42 percent will not.
In response to:

Stand For Life

Russell15 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 10:06 PM
Births should have been increasing every year, but before Roe the births were decreasing even though it was during the baby boom. It was not until after Roe that births increased. So your explanation is simply false. http://www.facebook.com/NaturalAbortionLaw#!/photo.php?fbid=433640433369404&set=pb.227923367274446.-2207520000.1358478141&type=3&theater
1 - 10 Next