"Labor Unions Kill the Twinkie and 18,000 Jobs" I get it - Hostess is bankrupt so it's the union's fault! Wrong! Michelle Obama personally shut down hostess with her anti-choice, pro-health food campaign. Four... more... YEARS... !

"You did NOT refute my claim that Bush won". You're changing the subject, Bill. And I never attempted to except right above - where I did, in fact. But you're a predictable nutter. You judge "reality" by the source, not the facts. All you nutters do EXACTLY the same thing. Why is that? Maybe you're all "real smart". Not that I care - that's history. But Allen West? He's the current electoral LOSER. " I provided a link to USA Today, a liberal rag" - that's how we're different (and why you're wrong!), I look at the data, not the source. You weak-minded fool.

Uh, Bill-O, you're typically predictable. Deciding based on the source over the data exposes you as the "fact hater". You might try reading before deciding what you "know" (not that I expect you will - too dumb). The Times was simply reporting the result of the Consortium Recount Analysis. You jut tell yourself that you "won". That's all that matters...

Bill-O, I'm leaving now. Not run off by you're feeble arguments. Just done with this thread. West is going home. Nothing will change that. And Franken is a sitting senator. And justly so. And NOTHING will change that either, Clown Haller. ~Cheers Winston

* run off

Bill, you did NOT "check back just for kicks". You've ignored my multiple replies that dress you down as a run of the mill Town Hall nutter. But keep telling yourself how smart your are and how you've run of the "libs". Whatever blows your skirt up, Bill... ~Cheers Winston

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/12VOTE.html?pagewanted=1

A statewide recount could have produced enough votes to tilt the election [Gore’s] way, no matter what standard was chosen to judge voter intent. If all the ballots had been reviewed under any of seven single standards, and combined with the results of an examination of overvotes, Mr. Gore would have won, by a very narrow margin. For example, using the most permissive "dimpled chad" standard, nearly 25,000 additional votes would have been reaped, yielding 644 net new votes for Mr. Gore and giving him a 107-vote victory margin. Using the most restrictive standard — the fully punched ballot card — 5,252 new votes would have been added to the Florida total, producing a net gain of 652 votes for Mr. Gore, and a 115-vote victory margin.

No they didn't. You're lying. And you know it. Or... Source? Bill, you keep telling yourself that you're presenting "facts". Don't worry about the fact that they're not.

Congressional Republicans: "Absent a promise to exempt income over $250K per year from a 4% increase, we'll allow tax rates on 100% of people to go up AND allow devastating budget cuts to drive the economy into another recession." That's it - 4% on income greater than $250K. Those Dems are SO unreasonable! I challenge ANYONE here to stand up and say they will be affected AND then say they will be harmed by it. No one here will, no one here can. ~Cheers Winston