In response to:

Obama Wins by Going Negative and Turning Out Base

rtrkut Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:33 AM
There's a big difference between saying 47% of the people pay no federal tax (sic. they're not going to vote for me because i say i'm going to lower federal taxes) and blaming your country's woes on a religious or ethnic group. You not being able to tell the difference tells me you are stupid and a democratic "sheeple" People like you are the reason this country is on the way to economic collapse and rampant inflation. You have no idea of the problems in America or how to fix them. Congratulations to your children and grandchildren on paying off the %50K each of them owe on the national debt and they deserve the declining future you've cast on them.
Seawolf Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:49 AM
Correct..My great grandfather lived during the Wiemar era...he wallpapered his living room with Deutschmarks, wall paper was worth more than the money itself. Our "highly intelligent" electorate will find out what they have wrought in their zeal for this commie clown just as the Germans did when too many supported hitler.
rtrkut Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:35 AM
P.S. Adolf Hitler came into power because of the rampant inflation cast upon Germany by the German govt. printing huge amounts of money---like we're doing.
Lukewarm. That's the feeling I get from the election numbers.

Turnout was apparently down, at least as a percentage of eligible voters. The president was re-elected by a reduced margin. The challenger didn't inspire the turnout surge he needed.

Every re-elected president since Andrew Jackson has won with an increased popular vote percentage. Barack Obama didn't. He won 53 percent to 46 percent in 2008. His numbers as I write are 50 percent to 48 percent over Mitt Romney. That could go up to 51 percent to 48 percent when California finishes its count, which took five weeks in 2008.

Obama owes most...