In response to:

Let’s Have That Conversation About Guns

rpm Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 6:42 PM
The NRA hasn't the slightest interest in atomic weapons, so don't look for any explanations from them. However, let me give you my viewpoint. As a currently lapsed NRA member (I get sick of all the junk mail) but one that, in the circumstances, is going to re-up and send them another $100 or so. I am a lot more comfortable with someone with the financial resources to acquire a nuclear weapon doing so (say Soros, or the Koch brothers) than I am with most, if not all governments, having nuclear weapons. Governments in the 20th Century killed at least 100M people; so far as I know even the detested Koch's haven't killed anyone. It would be bad for business.

For once I agree with liberals. It’s high time to have a conversation about guns. Let’s start with the problem that there are far too few guns on our streets.

Wait, we can’t have that conversation. In fact, we’re not supposed to have what people might commonly describe as a “conversation” at all. We’re supposed to shut-up and listen as liberals, barely masking their unseemly delight at the opportunity, try to pin the murder rampage of one degenerate creep on millions of law-abiding Americans who did nothing wrong. The conversation is then supposed to end with us waiving our fundamental right...