Cabernet sauvignon wine is better than fume blanc. Turkey is better than pork. Matter in the solid state is better than the plasma state. Each of those statements begs the question: Where's the proof? With subjective statements such as those, disagreements can go on forever. It's simply a matter of personal opinion. One person's...
A corollary of Dr Williams, thoughtful as usual, article is that the simpler something is, the more "experts" there are and the harder it is to come to a decision. For instance, observe a group of people trying to decide where to go to lunch. If the decision is complex, the group will defer to the one that has the most knowledge, or is at least reputed to have the most knowledge. If you want to design a high rise building, most people will hand the work over to an architect. What color to paint it? Everyone has an opinion, many passionate. As CEO of the company, I always delegated decisions on things like color. Didn't have time to add yet another opinion. There were plenty of experts already.
One of the more difficult lessons to teach economics neophytes -- and, many times, trained economists -- is that economic theory cannot say anything definitive about subjective statements, such as what's better, good, bad or worse. Let's try a few examples to make the point.
- Protip from Reid: Bundy supporters are “domestic terrorists,” y’know Ed Morrissey 19 minutes ago
- Video: Ukraine deal not exactly embraced by either side Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 10 hours ago
- Media Matters not super-keen on SEIU unionizing its employees Mary Katharine Ham 11 hours ago
- Video: How removing one regulation created hundreds of jobs in Mississippi Mary Katharine Ham 11 hours ago
- The EPA confirms: GHG emissions are down, largely thanks to… Erika Johnsen 12 hours ago