restore_You, Sir/Madam, have just written what may be the only "Profound Statement" I'll read today! GOOD SHOW!

James92-I don't know where you dug up that "armed march" info, but I must say that would be the MOST outrageous thing anybody or Political/Fraternal organization could ever contemplate! AND,, for the very "reason" you opine!

cap-but "it's still true!

Based upon what I've seen of past performances of "special counsel" and the like, I would not expect much! Having said that, I'm almost certain that if the Public at large knew the extent of abuse of mailing privileges by far too many 501c(3) and other "Non-profit" entities they would be Demanding AN OVERHAUL, IF NOT COMPLETE REVOCATION of that entire concept of Mailings. In my judgment a good portion of the USPS's Financial problem(s) would be reduced if such action was taken!

VV U make a decent point or two-However, seems to me Ur over-simplifying the total situation of Japan vs North Korea. LOTS of problems, Generations, old there I suspect.

Alive --You say (Paraphrased) "Obamao doesn't have to be *personally* involved in any of these scandals." You are, most likely, absolutely correct! His Majesty doesn't seem to have time to get into the mundane stuff like RUNNING THE COUNTRY!

sir asian-That is a GOOD number ! I called twice today-once on S744 and later on this MESS! Call 'em up, Folks--they "owe" us!

I have a 'Gut Feeling' that GW Bush is at the bottom of this scandal SOMEWHERE! Obama probably has a host of Clairvoyants working on that theory as I type?

darkcyder-"Distraction" from the Benghazi Fiasco may, in fact, be a major Point of Interest; However, I believe the principal reason to divert attention is S.744 (the "Immigration Bill". We ALL must call our Senators/Reps and DEMAND THAT THIS monstrosity never see the light of day! If anybody thinks the last infamous "Amnesty" was atrocious, then You AIN'T SEEN NOTHIN YET! PLEASE --get copy of S744 and read it and then DEMAND congressional NEGATIVE response to the entire package! For all the "Dreadnaughts" out there--I have been married to a Foreign National who has been a NATURALIZED CITIZEN for 42 Years--No Prejudice-Lots of SENSE!

Ron781-I share your enthusiasm for an "explanation" to the use of ID! I'm reasonably sure my Kids had to have ID requirements for College(s) etc. I just can't see the problem. Now I WOULD object to being tattooed or branded! (Joke-and a bad one?)

Teleprompter-OH, goodness!! Now you're on "sacred ground"! Of course we can't force "old, retired, handicapped" and Most importantly "probably minorities" to get an ID to enable the clean-up of the Electoral System.. No, No, No! What are U Thinking?