cont.... watching that show we saw the stark difference between someone who would risk political clout to do the right thing for the country, and someone who does everything for political clout and expediency, despite what was good for the country. Reagan never would have "played chicken" with the US economy to force unsustainable spending upon the taxpayers of this country. Reagan was the polar opposite of Barack Obama. And no amount of revisionist history from the glassy eyed slobbering cult of Obama will ever change that.

hands down by far the best quote of this article has to be " he told reporters (aka admirers)", almost did a spit-take with my coffee. you have nailed it mona. by chance i watched a show called "decisions that shook the world" and it was about Ronald Reagan and the way he dealt with the soviet union , which no matter what his critics say, ended the cold war, reduced nuclear arms count, and freed millions of people from an oppressive bohemoth. And to both my wife and I it was stunning the differences between our current "chicago machine byproduct/ anti colonial community organizer and someone who truly loved and believed in America and got millions of other to shake of the "Carter doldrums".

and dont forget the "community organizer in cheif" himself, who takes great pleasure in bashing publicly anyone who dares oppose his fundamental transformation. (fox, republicans, bitter clingers, etc etc). Question: If you loved something would you really want to change the Fundamentals of it?

nothing happened during that timespan that would have affected the economy adversely...say 9/11 and the market crash immediately after, afghan war, iraq war, katrina....none of that would have affected economy. and since your so proud to be a california democrat whats your states budget deficit again? how high are the taxes in california again? And since you brought up that things are so better since 2006 insinuating that a democratic congress has done a better job. there has been 6.4 TRILLION DOLLARS ADDED TO OUR NATIONAL DEBT UNDER YOUR DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS.... hell we are running at least 1.2 TRILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL DEFICITS. By any measure that is unsustainable, and irresponsible to our children. Bravo!

its true ...these days there are no news storys or reports...the are all commentary/ editorials. we want the facts, we can disseminate the info on our own without the help of the Obama Media....we are idiots...errr...i mean Obama Voters.

she was simply quoting an NBC story einstein...and better yet she did something the shameless guiltless hypocritical left NEVER does....RETRACT INNACURACIES.

now come on....we all know a the only thing a liberal will get in between is you and your money. or you and your kids...or you and your freedom of choice...or you and what light bulb you use or you and what toilet you flush....you know what??? nevermind i was wrong ...my bad. you may have a shot at that "you and the monster" thing after all.

not to mention the armed guards that flank them whenever they leave that big white building where they steal our liberties and mandate mediocrity.

so bankrupting the country...that had nothing to do with democrat spending.. bush left us a 400 billion dollar yearly deficit and obamas has been AT LEAST 1.2 TRILLION per year he has been in office. national debt when bush left office? 10 trillion...what is it now troll? 16 TRILLION. 6 trillion dollars added to the debt in the last 4 years alone. he has borrowed more money than georges washington thru BUSH combined. and you think for a second you can sit there and say nah...its the republicans fault. Unbelievably naive, or just dishonest? do you trolls actually read the $#!T media matters tells you to type?

the people who spent at least 1.2 TRILLION dollars more a year than we take in for the last 4 years with this year projected to no different, and have passed NO BUDGETS for the last 4 years SO YOU CANT SEE WHAT THEY ARE SPENDING YOUR TAXES ON...are calling the republicans "irresponsible" for asking them to cut spending. you see what the class warrior in cheif fails to mention is that the taxes obama reid and pelosi are pining for will pay no more than 2% of the the forecasted spending for the next 10 years. they will raise between 80-90 BILLION dollars but hold up...wasnt last months deficit reported to be 120 BILLION? the democrats are not serious about spending reform. they threw up obamas plan... a plan that dems didnt even vote for.