1 - 10 Next
How about 1 from column A and one from column B.
In response to:

Cease the Cease-Fires

Ronald494 Wrote: Jul 29, 2014 8:28 AM
Kind of reminds me of another famous Thomas in our history.
In response to:

The Devil in Global Warming Details

Ronald494 Wrote: Jul 28, 2014 10:23 PM
Like your comment. What is there about the human psyche that allows tragedy to be so humorous.
In response to:

The Devil in Global Warming Details

Ronald494 Wrote: Jul 28, 2014 10:07 PM
I learned before I was 12 that was futile to argue religion. It is a belief system just as the global warming belief system has become, not a provable are arguable fact system. I would like to read a good treatise on the phenomenon of human propensity to take up a position based on belief and fight to the death practically not to give it up. It must have been useful in our evolution for survival to stick tenaciously to whatever we are told is a 'fact' and stop thinking for ourselves beyond anything which supports the 'fact'. It is only through science (by definition skeptical of all statements until enough un-conflicting evidence and no conflicting data can be found that can settle the matter) that man's knowledge ever progresses.
In response to:

The Devil in Global Warming Details

Ronald494 Wrote: Jul 28, 2014 9:37 PM
$4.7 Billion / year from US government (us taxpayers) alone is totally corrupting the research universities which must do the 'research' which the government wants them to do or will not receive contracts if they propose otherwise. Like all political money flow in the crony capitalism loop, it has been built into our election system by the congress. With the monster government/ industry/ tax steamroller which has evolved since introduction by the UN it is professional suicide for scientists to oppose it. They are shunned not only by the gov't contracting agencies but their own scientist brethren who cannot afford to be pushed off the train. I suppose I should applaud them for at whatever professional integrity they are able to put in their report conclusions but their complicity(by their silence) is what allows the UN to continue their lies which allow the EPA to use the UN's political statements about 'science' and foist financially egregious regulations on our power and transportation industries.
Sorry, they have already shown that they have either no interest or no ability to read. A solution relying less on the EPA's participation will be required.
No worries, there will be rotating brown outs for those who can still afford electricity so the light bulb will be a moot point.
The University of East Anglia who ostensibly had the temperature data upon which this conjecture was based claimed that they could no longer find the data. (maybe their disk crashed).
Even using the numbers of their own junk science; "Even EPA models acknowledge that its rules will prevent an undetectable 0.018 degrees Celsius (0.032 deg F) of total global warming in 100 years! " Since there is no projected benefit to world temperature there can be no economic benefit either to the US or even the entire world. They have only cost and zero benefit in their cost/benefit analysis. The have no legal ground for their regulations of CO2. How can such insanity be allowed to prevail?
In response to:

The Day of the Hawk

Ronald494 Wrote: Jul 22, 2014 10:10 PM
Other than 'not the Russians' , does anyone know whose side we are on over there?
1 - 10 Next