In response to:

God and Jerusalem

Ron4594 Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 12:37 PM
Whom would you rather have defending half of the left coast of the country: Loyal, trained people who know the tactics of the Muslim/Arab/Palestinian terrorist enemy, and how to counter them, or Liberals helping the Muslim in the White House destroy the country and turn control of it over to the Muslims/Arabs in the sandbox? The people of New Israel would have peace from constant Muslim/Arab/Palestinian attacks, and would be able to use their resources for peaceful projects: Medical advancements, improving farming techniques, etc. New Israel would drill and refine its offshore oil, giving us petroleum products in return for the reduced amount of support we give to New Israel.

Who would have thought that God and Jerusalem would become controversial issues at this year's Democratic National Convention?

Previous Democratic Party platforms had mentioned God and referred to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. After both were initially missing from this year's platform, someone apparently realized that this was likely to raise questions about Democrats that they could ill afford to have raised in an election year.

So the convention faced a vote on whether to restore God and Jerusalem to their party's platform. Rather than risk a roll-call vote from the delegates, the chair called for a voice...

Thursday, May 23 | 06:36 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 06:36 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 06:36 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 06:36 PM ET