In response to:

Rubio's Amnesty: A Path to Oblivion for the GOP

Ron-CA Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 9:40 AM
Libertarians are not a minority - they are simply liberals in sheep's clothing. From the first line of the libertarian platform: "As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others." You can't find this kind of moral relativism anywhere but the Democratic liberals .
agitator Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 10:24 AM
howard194 Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 10:22 AM
howard194 Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 10:21 AM
agitator Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 10:13 AM
yes, English is my second language.
Joan383 Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 10:06 AM
Is English your second language? You COMPLETELY missed the point. Not surprising. Here's what that line ACTUALLY means: A person does not live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for me. This means that government only exists to enforce an orderly society, it does not legislate morals, thought, or charity. It is as far away from progressives and liberals as can be.
agitator Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 9:57 AM
R, false!

Libertarians are individualists.

Liberals are egalitarian communitarians.

Libs and cons are sheep!

Conservatives are hierarchical communitarians.
howard194 Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 9:56 AM
contemporary libetarians are nothing more than the reconstituted kooks formerly known as constitutionalists. i've known a few of these people personally and they take the notion of liberty/constitutionalism to absurd and extreme degrees.

they are not conservatives. and they may not share liberal ideologies, but their adherence to unrealistic extremism, and non-support of conservativism, gives the left a big advantage by taking these kooks out of the voting demographic.

Apart from finding out that Barack Obama did far worse in his re-election than nearly any other incumbent who won re-election, the only thing that perked me up after Nov. 6 was coming across a Time magazine published after the 2004 election, when George W. Bush won a second term.

In the mirror image of all the 2012 post-election analyses, the Democrats were said to be finished, out of ideas, hopelessly unpopular. It's like watching MSNBC, with the word "Democrats" replaced with "Republicans."

Democrats had thrown everything they had into beating Bush, crushing the Howard Dean wing of...

Sunday, May 19 | 09:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 09:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 09:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 09:06 AM ET